Explained : Justice Surya Kant Ruling on Land-Acquisition
- Legal
- June 8, 2025

The Supreme Court held that investigating agencies cannot summon advocates for questioning about their clients. The ruling upholds Section 132 BSA, protects the right to legal representation, and redefines the limits of investigative powers under the BNSS.
READ MORE
The 2025 Supreme Court judgment in Lancor Holdings v. Prem Menon reshapes Indian arbitration by linking timeliness to fairness and public policy. Justice Sanjay Kumar’s ruling introduces the doctrine of “delay-based patent illegality,” ensuring that delayed or unworkable awards can be challenged to protect integrity and efficiency in arbitration proceedings.
READ MORE
The Rejanish K.V. ruling clarified eligibility under Article 233(2) but also tested the Supreme Court’s own boundaries. By using Article 145(3) in a review petition, the Court turned a settled issue into a fresh constitutional trial.
READ MORE
The Supreme Court’s Novenco judgment expands the meaning of “urgent interim relief” under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015. It holds that ongoing IP infringements create inherent urgency, allowing plaintiffs to bypass pre-institution mediation. This ruling reshapes India’s mediation landscape and redefines the balance between speedy justice and alternative dispute resolution.
READ MORE
After its Periyammal v. Rajamani directive, district courts cleared 3.38 lakh execution petitions—about 38% of the backlog.
The landmark drive exposed the scale of India execution petitions pendency 2025 and set a model for judicial accountability.

When IndiGo’s founders took their feud to international arbitration, it didn’t just settle a corporate clash—it redefined how India resolves business disputes.
READ MORE