Karan Dinesh Singh Rawat is Partner @ Dinesh Singh Law Associates Practices Corporate Law and Legal Strategy Corporate Law and writes reviews on Judgments passed by Supreme Court of India in public interest.
India’s IT Rules 2026 create a new legal regime for regulating AI-generated and deepfake content, requiring platforms to label, prevent, and rapidly remove synthetic media.
READ MORE
The Supreme Court’s decision in Habib Alladin & Ors. v. Mohammed Ahmed redraws the jurisdictional boundaries of Wakf Tribunals. By rejecting jurisdiction based solely on “waqf by user” claims and reaffirming civil court authority where wakf status is disputed, the judgment restores statutory discipline and aligns wakf adjudication with the Wakf (Amendment) Act, 2025.
READ MORE
In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court in M/s Premium Transmission Pvt. Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra & Ors. clarified that an industrial dispute may be referred even without a prior charter of demands. This critical analysis examines how the Court redefined conciliation, “apprehended disputes,” and access to adjudication—especially in contract labour cases—while shaping interpretation under India’s new Labour Codes.
READ MOREIn Kumud Lall v. Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) through LRs & Ors., the Supreme Court is examining whether a consumer complaint alleging medical negligence survives after the death of the opposite party and whether compensation can be recovered from the deceased’s estate through legal heirs. The case arises from a complaint filed under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, where both the doctor accused of negligence and the complainant passed away during prolonged litigation. Recognising the wider implications for consumer law and medical negligence cases across the country, the Court has appointed Amicus Curiae to assist in clarifying the continuity of consumer remedies, estate liability, and the transition between the 1986 and 2019 consumer protection regimes.
READ MORE
You must be logged in to post a comment.