Karan Dinesh Singh Rawat is Partner @ Dinesh Singh Law Associates Practices Corporate Law and Legal Strategy Corporate Law and writes reviews on Judgments passed by Supreme Court of India in public interest.
The Supreme Court’s judgment in Accamma Sam Jacob v. State of Karnataka makes one point clear: a land dispute does not turn purely civil just because title questions exist. When the complaint prima facie alleges fraud, forgery, cheating, conspiracy, and deceptive use of documents, investigation must move forward before the High Court shuts the case down.
READ MORE
IFSCA’s April 2026 consultation paper proposes standardised SAC mapping and foreign currency expense reporting for IFSC units under SERF and MPR. The reform looks technical. However, its impact could be much wider for compliance, reporting quality, and the way GIFT IFSC’s economic contribution is measured.
READ MORE
In Sharada Sanghi & Ors. v. Asha Agarwal & Ors. 2026 INSC 292, the Supreme Court clarified that dismissal of an earlier suit for default does not amount to res judicata under Section 11 CPC. Even so, the Court refused relief because the appellants had abandoned direct title challenges and later tried to secure the same result through execution. The ruling sharpens the line between strict res judicata and broader abuse-of-process control in civil procedure.
READ MORE
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Om Sakthi Sekar v. V. Sukumar shows that a confirmed DRT auction sale does not always block a later valuation review. Yet the judgment leaves key factual questions unresolved and should be read with care.
READ MORE
You must be logged in to post a comment.