logo

A Research Based Journalism

  • ABC Research
  • Agriculture
  • Business
  • Environment
  • Geopolitical
  • Health
  • Investigation
  • India
  • Legal
    • SCJudgments

Legal

  • Home
  •  
  • Legal
  • Explained: India’s IT Rules 2026 for AI and Deepfakes

    Explained: India’s IT Rules 2026 for AI and Deepfakes0

    • Legal
    • February 11, 2026

    India’s IT Rules 2026 create a new legal regime for regulating AI-generated and deepfake content, requiring platforms to label, prevent, and rapidly remove synthetic media.

    By Karan Dinesh Singh Rawat
    READ MORE
  • Explained: SC Reference on Order IX Rule 13 CPC in N. Rajaram

    Explained: SC Reference on Order IX Rule 13 CPC in N. Rajaram0

    • Legal
    • February 9, 2026

    The Supreme Court’s reference in N. Rajaram v. R. Murali & Ors. v. R. Murali on Order IX Rule 13 CPC exposes long-standing uncertainty over whether non-parties and transferees pendente lite can seek setting aside of ex-parte decrees. This report critically examines the doctrinal conflict, its interface with Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, and how procedural ambiguity fuels delay-driven litigation.

    By Dinesh Singh Rawat
    READ MORE
  • Explained: How India’s IIAC Act Undermines Cause of Arbitration

    Explained: How India’s IIAC Act Undermines Cause of Arbitration0

    • Legal
    • February 7, 2026

    The India International Arbitration Centre Act, 2019 was meant to promote institutional arbitration. However, in practice, its bureaucratic design contradicts arbitration’s market-driven nature and weakens India’s global ambitions.

    By Dinesh Singh Rawat
    READ MORE
  • Rajia Begum Judgment: When Courts Must Refuse Arbitration

    Rajia Begum Judgment: When Courts Must Refuse Arbitration0

    • Legal
    • February 3, 2026

    The Supreme Court’s ruling in Rajia Begum v. Barnali Mukherjee clarifies when courts must refuse arbitration. If parties dispute the very existence of the arbitration agreement, courts—not arbitrators—must decide first.

    By Dinesh Singh Rawat
    READ MORE
  • Critical Analysis: Dr S. Mohan v Puducherry Tech University

    Critical Analysis: Dr S. Mohan v Puducherry Tech University0

    • Legal
    • February 1, 2026

    The Supreme Court’s judgment in Dr S. Mohan v Puducherry Technological University clarifies the binding force of UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor appointments, limits executive influence, and explains why Article 254 does not apply. This critical analysis examines the constitutional reasoning, quo warranto principles, and the Court’s use of Article 142.

    By Team ABC
    READ MORE
  • Explained: When Arbitration Finality Meets Contract Law

    Explained: When Arbitration Finality Meets Contract Law0

    • Legal
    • February 1, 2026

    The Supreme Court’s ruling in Saisudhir Energy v. NVVNL explains how courts must balance arbitration finality with contractual fairness, limit interference under Sections 34 and 37, and enforce liquidated damages in public-interest contracts.

    By Dinesh Singh Rawat
    READ MORE
  • «
  • ‹
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • ›
  • »
  • Legal
    Explained : Justice Surya Kant Ruling on Land-Acquisition
    • Legal
    • June 8, 2025
  • Ramesh Chand vs. Suresh Chand: Will and Title Disputes in India
    • Legal
    • September 8, 2025
  • Explained: How Dubai–India Can Transform Global Arbitration
    • Legal
    • November 10, 2025
  • Cheque Bounce Legal Status After Celestium Financial Judgment
    • Legal
    • July 31, 2025
  • Explained: Constitutionality of Blood Donation Guidelines in India
    • Health, Legal
    • August 14, 2025
© Copyright All Right Reserved