Explained: The Complete Court History of the Epstein Files
- Investigation
- November 17, 2025

The proposed increase in Supreme Court judge strength from 33 to 37 excluding the CJI can benefit citizens by creating more benches and improving hearing capacity. However, the reform will succeed only if the Court also improves listing, old-case disposal, Article 136 filtering, Constitution Bench scheduling, and government litigation control.
READ MORE
The DSLA Weekly Supreme Court Review Edition 1 (2026) provides a critical analysis of key Supreme Court judgments, the legal questions involved, judicial reasoning, and their impact on Indian jurisprudence. It also examines bench composition, Article 136 trends, and emerging legal patterns shaping litigation strategy in India.
READ MORE
The Supreme Court in case titled Om Prakash Chawnika v. State of Jharkhand & Anr has ruled that police arrest in a private complaint case cannot take place without a court-issued warrant. The judgment strengthens liberty, limits police power, and discourages mechanical anticipatory bail petitions.
READ MORE
The government brought the 131st Amendment Bill and the Delimitation Bill even without a secure two-thirds majority because the move served both legislative and political purposes. It sought to pass the package, build pressure on the opposition, and, if defeated, shape a public narrative that the opposition had stalled women’s reservation and electoral reform.
READ MORE
You must be logged in to post a comment.