India has launched the world’s largest village-level grain storage reform through PACS cooperatives. Here’s how it reshapes MSP, food prices, rural credit, and food security.
New Delhi (ABC Live): India has now launched the world’s largest local grain storage reform through the “World’s Largest Grain Storage Plan in the Cooperative Sector,” approved on 31 May 2023. Until now, India’s food system relied mostly on large, central warehouses run by national agencies. However, the new plan clearly shifts storage control to village cooperatives (PACS). As a result, this scheme is not just about building godowns, but about changing how food buying, storage, credit, and prices work across rural India.
Moreover, this reform is also a key part of what ABC Live calls India’s Second Green Revolution, where progress comes from better storage, transport, credit, and processing—not only from higher crop output.
🔗 https://abclive.in/2025/11/29/second-green-revolution/
Core Goals of the Scheme
At its core, the plan aims to fix deep problems in the farm economy. Step by step, it seeks to:
-
First, stop the distress sales by farmers
-
Second, cut post-harvest losses
-
Third, allow local MSP buying
-
Fourth, control food price swings
-
Finally, turn PACS into multi-use rural business hubs
Therefore, the plan uses combined funding from many government schemes, mainly:
-
Agriculture Infrastructure Fund (AIF)
-
Agricultural Marketing Infrastructure (AMI)
-
Farm Mechanisation Mission (SMAM)
-
PM Formalisation of Micro Food Processing (PMFME)
-
Public Distribution System (PDS)
What Is Being Built at the Village Level
Under this plan, each PACS is slowly turned into a full rural service centre. In simple terms, this includes:
-
Safe grain godowns
-
Custom hiring centres for farm tools
-
Small food processing units
-
Fair price shops
-
Internal roads, weighing systems, and boundary walls
As a result, PACS are no longer only loan offices. Instead, they become local hubs for storage, services, and public supply.
Why Earlier Grain Storage Systems Fell Short
Food Corporation of India (FCI) – Since 1965
For nearly 60 years, most grain storage was run by the Food Corporation of India (FCI). No doubt, FCI built a strong national network for buying and moving grain. However, the system stayed highly centralised. Because of this, farmers had to depend on faraway depots.
ABC Live’s full report on FCI’s role is available here:
🔗 https://abclive.in/2025/10/12/food-corporation-of-india/
Central & State Warehousing Corporations
Likewise, government warehouse companies built large storage units near cities and rail routes. Even so, PACS were left out of ownership. So, price control at the village level stayed weak.
Gramin Bhandaran Yojana (2001)
Later, the Rural Godown Scheme aimed to stop distress sale. But in practice, most godowns went to private traders, not cooperatives. As a result, MSP and ration supply links stayed weak.
Private Entrepreneurs Guarantee (PEG) Scheme (2008)
After the world food crisis, private godowns grew fast under payment guarantees. Yet, PACS stayed outside the system. So, farmers did not gain real control over storage.
Silo-Based Storage (After 2015)
Steel silos cut waste and sped up handling. Still, they stayed far from villages and needed heavy spending. Thus, small farmers saw little direct benefit.
Decentralised Procurement Scheme (DCP)
Some states started buying grain locally. But, storage still stayed with FCI and state firms. So, local buying and local storage never fully came together.
What are the 2023 PACS Plan Changes
| Old System | New PACS System |
|---|---|
| FCI-owned storage | PACS-owned storage |
| City-based godowns | Village-based godowns |
| Rent paid to firms | Income earned by PACS |
| Long farm-to-godown travel | Short first-mile movement |
| MSP, storage, and ration split | MSP + Storage + Ration merged |
| Weak farmer price power | Strong local price control |
Therefore, unlike past schemes that only added space, this plan fixes the ownership gap at the heart of India’s food system.
Problems Found in the Pilot Phase
However, the trial phase also showed many roadblocks:
| Problem | Result |
|---|---|
| Old cost limits | Projects became costly |
| Same cost for plains & hills | Risk ignored |
| No aid for internal roads | Daily work suffered |
| Weak PACS finances | Loans got delayed |
| No common DPR format | Paperwork slowed |
| No hiring promise | Banks stayed cautious |
| Storage not matched to need | Sites chosen poorly |
Key Fixes Made by the Government
✔ Loan Period Extended
First, loan payback time was increased from 2+5 years to 2+8 years, reducing yearly stress on PACS.
✔ New Cost & Subsidy Rates
| Area | Cost per MT | Subsidy per MT |
|---|---|---|
| Plains | ₹7,000 | ₹2,333 |
| North-East | ₹8,000 | ₹2,666 |
Also, an extra subsidy was added for roads, walls, and weighing systems.
✔ 9-Year Hiring Promise by FCI
Most importantly, FCI agreed to rent godowns for 9 years if size is 2,500 MT or more. Because of this, banks began giving loans.
✔ Scheme Opened Beyond PACS
Now it also covers:
-
Other cooperatives
-
Cooperative federations
-
Multi-State Cooperative Societies (MSCS)
National Progress So Far (as of 15 Nov 2025)
| Indicator | Status |
|---|---|
| PACS Identified | 704 |
| DPRs Filed | 304 (43.18%) |
| Godowns Built | 96 (13.63%) |
| Storage Added | 59,702 MT |
So, while planning is wide, actual building is still slow.
Where Storage Is Being Built the Most
| State | Capacity (MT) | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Rajasthan | 35,250 | 59.04% |
| Maharashtra | 17,952 | 30.06% |
| Others | 6,500 | 10.90% |
Thus, almost 89% of total storage lies in just two states.
State Performance Grades
-
A: Rajasthan
-
B: Maharashtra
-
C: Gujarat, UP, Assam, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Telangana, MP, Uttarakhand, Tripura
-
D: Odisha, Jharkhand, Haryana, Chhattisgarh, J&K, HP
-
E (No Entry): Punjab, Bihar, Andhra Pradesh, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Arunachal Pradesh
Notably, Punjab, Bihar, and Andhra Pradesh grow large quantities of grain but still show no entry in this plan.
Cost Per Metric Tonne (Plain Areas)
| Item | ₹ per MT | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Govt Subsidy | 2,333 | 33.3% |
| PACS Share | 700 | 10% |
| Bank Loan | 3,967 | 56.7% |
| Total Cost | 7,000 | 100% |
So, a 2,500 MT godown costs about ₹1.75 crore, with about ₹58 lakh subsidy and ₹99 lakh bank loan.
PACS Financial Stress Test (Simple View)
| Usage Level | Yearly Income | Final Result |
|---|---|---|
| 100% use | ₹30 lakh | ₹8 lakh gain |
| 70% use | ₹21 lakh | ₹1 lakh loss |
| Full use, lower rent | ₹22.5 lakh | Near break-even |
Hence, below 80–85% use, PACS may struggle to stay profitable.
Effect on Food Price Swings
| PACS Storage Share | Price Swings Level |
|---|---|
| 0% | 80 |
| 20% | 60 |
| 40% | 40 |
| 50%+ | 30 |
So, the more storage moves closer to villages, the narrower food price swings become.
Why Training and Education Matter
Finally, the success of this plan depends on trained PACS staff, simple accounting skills, and basic technical know-how. That is why, modern farm education reforms are closely linked to this project.
🔗 https://abclive.in/2025/11/04/modern-agriculture-education/
Quick Policy Snapshot for Lawmakers
| Item | Status |
|---|---|
| PACS Identified | 704 |
| DPR Rate | 43.18% |
| Build Rate | 13.63% |
| Storage Added | 59,702 MT |
| Subsidy Used | ~₹140 crore |
| Bank Loans | ~₹270–280 crore |
| FCI Rental Promise | 9 years |
| Main Risk | Slow state action |
Legal & Policy Value
As a result, the plan:
-
Weakens the old FCI storage monopoly
-
Builds local buffer ownership
-
Helps India defend food support at the WTO
-
Fits within India’s:
-
Food Security Law
-
Essential Commodities Law
-
Cooperative Laws
-
If Half the PACS Get Built (Future View)
If even 50% of PACS build 2,500 MT godowns, India could gain:
-
8.8 million MT of local storage
-
25–30% drop in load on big central godowns
-
15–20% fall in storage waste
-
MSP payment time cut to 7–10 days
-
Strong rural job growth
ABC Live Final View
India has now fixed the money design of grain storage. What still holds it back is slow state action, uneven PACS strength, and weak local control in key grain states.
So, this scheme will either become:
✅ A true food-security shift, or
⚠️ Just another partly finished flagship plan.
Official Source
This analysis is based on a written reply by Union Minister for Home & Cooperation Shri Amit Shah in the Rajya Sabha on 10 December 2025, issued by PIB Delhi.
Exact URLs (For Copy-Paste Footnotes / Hyperlinks)
-
World’s Largest Grain Storage Plan — PIB (22 Jul 2025)
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2146718®=3&lang=2 Press Information Bureau -
World’s Largest Grain Storage Plan — earlier PIB (26 Mar 2025) summary
https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2115198®=3&lang=2 Press Information Bureau -
Official Margdarshika / SOP Document (Ministry of Cooperation) for the Plan
(PDF) https://www.cooperation.gov.in/sites/default/files/2025-08/WLGSP%20English%20Margdarshika%20SOP.pdf Cooperation Ministry -
Rural Godown Scheme (Gramin Bhandaran Yojana) official page — DMI
https://dmi.gov.in/Schemegby.aspx dmi.gov.in -
NABARD’s Warehouse Infrastructure Fund / Storage Financing page
https://www.nabard.org/content1.aspx?catid=8&id=571&mid=8 NABARD -
Central Warehousing Corporation background & statutory role
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Warehousing_Corporation (for institutional background — or refer to official CWC Act documents)
ABC Live Editorial Note:
This analysis is part of ABC Live’s continuing National Food Security and Cooperative Reform Tracking Series.
The Grain Storage Plan reflects India’s most ambitious decentralisation of food security infrastructure to date.
© ABC Live Research Desk, 2025















