New Delhi (ABC Live): In an age defined by artificial intelligence, satellite surveillance, cyber warfare, and global trade, the power of geography may seem outdated. Yet, as Robert D. Kaplan contends in The Revenge of Geography, physical terrain continues to define the possibilities—and limits—of national power. For India, this rule remains profoundly relevant.

India’s geography is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers immense strategic leverage through maritime dominance in the Indian Ocean, a vast coastline, and a commanding position over crucial trade routes. On the other, it imposes chronic challenges: contested land borders with nuclear neighbors, narrow corridors vulnerable to disruption, and rugged mountainous terrain that hinders mobility and infrastructure development.

Kaplan’s framework invites us to view geography not as a passive backdrop but as an active shaper of policy, strategy, and power. In this context, India’s regional aspirations and global posture must be understood through the enduring influence of its physical location. Even in the AI era, the map still matters. Readers may refer to Kaplan’s arguments in his book The Revenge of Geography for a foundational perspective on this enduring theory. but as an active shaper of policy, strategy, and power. In this context, India’s regional aspirations and global posture must be understood through the enduring influence of its physical location. Even in the AI era, the map still matters.

Geography in the Information and AI Age

Even in the digital world, geography influences:

• Infrastructure placement: Data centers, satellite stations, submarine cables, and launch facilities.
• Chokepoint control: Sea lanes like the Malacca Strait impact digital supply chains and cyber resilience.
• Strategic roots of power: Space programs, quantum research, and cyber defense remain tied to national territory.

Thus, Kaplan’s rule has evolved, not disappeared. Geography still underpins strategic behavior.

India’s Geographic Strengths: A Regional Advantage

India’s location in South Asia and the Indian Ocean Region (IOR) makes it a maritime power with continental depth.

• Indian Ocean Centrality: India controls routes between Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.
• Andaman & Nicobar Advantage: Overlooks the vital Strait of Malacca.
• Himalayan Shield: Natural defense in the north.

Supporting Data:

• 20+ naval bases, including Port Blair.
• 90% of trade by volume via sea.
• Indian Navy ranks 7th globally.
• 1.4 billion tonnes cargo handled in 2023–24.
• 2.3 million sq km Exclusive Economic Zone.

India’s Geographic Constraints: Chokepoints and Border Pressures

• Two-front threat: Conflicts with Pakistan and China along long disputed borders.
• Siliguri Corridor: Only 22 km wide, a logistical and military vulnerability.
• Difficult Terrain: Himalayas hinder rapid deployment.

Data Points:

• Over 15% of the defense budget goes to border infrastructure.
• ₹2.7 lakh crore allocated for defense in 2023–24.
• 60% of borders are conflict-prone.
• Northeast region contributes <5% GDP but demands high military resources.

India is turning its geographic challenges into strategic strengths:

• Act East Policy: Diversifying links to Southeast Asia.
• SAGAR Doctrine: Leadership in the Indian Ocean.
• Quad Alliance: Aligning with U.S., Japan, Australia.
• Infrastructure Modernization: Roads, tunnels, and ports.

Data Insights:

• 4,800 km border roads built (2020–24).
• IPEF predicts $200 billion trade with ASEAN by 2030.
• Sagarmala Project aims to modernize 577 coastal projects. For more details on this strategic initiative, see the Sagarmala Programme official site.

Kaplan’s Rule and India: A Realist Framework

“Geography is the backdrop to human history itself, setting the stage upon which civilizations rise and fall.” – Robert D. Kaplan

“India’s geostrategic position grants it influence, but its geography also demands constant vigilance and resilience.” – C. Raja Mohan, Strategic Affairs Expert

“Maps shape minds. Geography is not just about where countries are, but about how their futures are shaped.” – Tim Marshall, author of Prisoners of Geography

Kaplan reminds us that:

• Geography sets limits on power.
• India’s map explains both maritime assertiveness and land-border caution.
• Digital strategy still depends on physical infrastructure and security.

India’s hybrid power posture—regional dominance with global ambition—is shaped by terrain as much as by technology.

• Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan (1979–89): Soviet military might failed to overcome the mountainous terrain.
• British Naval Power: Insular geography enabled sea dominance.
• India-China 1962 War: Geography contributed to India’s strategic disadvantage.
• Battle of the Malacca Strait (WWII): Control of chokepoints proved decisive.
• U.S. Global Projection: Oceanic buffers facilitated global reach.

Criticism of Kaplan’s Rule in the 21st Century

While insightful, Kaplan’s thesis has limits:

• Tech leapfrogging: Singapore & Israel succeed despite geographic limits.
• Overemphasis on terrain: Underrates non-state actors, soft power, and global markets.
• Static worldview: Ignores dynamic shifts from climate change and regional blocs (e.g., ASEAN).
• Leadership over landscape: Japan’s Post-War Rise shows how policy can transcend terrain.

Kaplan’s rule should be a foundational lens—not a strategic ceiling.

India, China, and the U.S.: A Strategic Geography Comparison

Conclusion: Geography as a Foundation, Not a Fate

Kaplan’s rule continues to be a powerful lens for interpreting India’s place in the world. While technology, diplomacy, and economics evolve, the constraints and opportunities created by geography endure. India’s strategic map—defined by the Himalayas in the north, deep-sea access in the south, and chokepoints to its east—sets the parameters for both ambition and vulnerability.

However, geography is not destiny. India’s future will also depend on how effectively it mitigates these constraints through innovation, diplomacy, infrastructure, and alliances. Kaplan’s rule doesn’t dictate outcomes—it defines the arena in which they are contested.

In a century of fast-paced technological change, geography remains the most constant variable. For India, mastering its geography—rather than being mastered by it—will determine how far it can rise on the global stage.

Also, Read

Explained: India Diaspora Policy –Data, Legal Cases & Strategy