Judicial Proceedings Records Comes under RTI Act :CIC

0
62

New Delhi (ABC Live): Judicial Proceedings Records : The Central Information Commission today once gain opined that  judicial proceedings and records  come under the definition of  public records thus open for public access under Right to Information act , even if information seeker  is not party to the said proceedings, has a right to secure desired information.

As per information a person named YN Prasad had filed an RTI before PIO Ahlmad Evening Court, seeking copy of response filed in a complaint against the management of Redeemed Christian Church of God, Janakpuri, before the MM, Karkardooma court. Upon denial of the information sought he had approached the state commission, but failed to get the sought information.

Thereafter he filed appeal before the Central Information Commission, Information Commissioner Yashovardhan Azad who has  directed the PIO to offer inspection of the judicial file to the appellant on a mutual convenient day and time.

The court also observed that the applicant shall be entitled to avail copies from the record upon payment of usual charges.

It is pertinent to note a decision in Iqbal Kaur vs NCDRC by the Central Information Commission in 2011, wherein it denied information sought by third-party relating to court proceedings which involved other individuals or persons who has personal interest in the said case. In that case, the commission had observed: “Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act exempts the disclosure of such information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the individual.”

It is also relevant to mention that Delhi High Court has reserved its judgment in the case titled Registrar, Supreme Court of India vs RS Mishra & others, wherein the issue is whether an application seeking information relating to court proceedings concerning the disclosure of such information to the applicant.

Read decision of CIC